Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges

Igor Grossmann*, Tanja M. Gerlach, J.J.A. Denissen

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people's reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others' perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)611-622
JournalSocial Psychological and Personality Science
Volume7
Issue number7
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Keywords

  • wisdom
  • state vs
  • trait
  • reasoning
  • emotion regulation
  • forgiveness
  • 3-DIMENSIONAL WISDOM SCALE
  • PERSONALITY STATES
  • SELF-REFLECTION
  • FORGIVENESS
  • INTELLIGENCE
  • KNOWLEDGE
  • PERFORMANCE
  • EXCELLENCE
  • STRENGTH
  • DISTANCE

Cite this

Grossmann, Igor ; Gerlach, Tanja M. ; Denissen, J.J.A. / Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. In: Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2016 ; Vol. 7, No. 7. pp. 611-622.
@article{cf9d640699af41e1bc21beacab18a86b,
title = "Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges",
abstract = "How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people's reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others' perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.",
keywords = "wisdom, state vs, trait, reasoning, emotion regulation, forgiveness, 3-DIMENSIONAL WISDOM SCALE, PERSONALITY STATES, SELF-REFLECTION, FORGIVENESS, INTELLIGENCE, KNOWLEDGE, PERFORMANCE, EXCELLENCE, STRENGTH, DISTANCE",
author = "Igor Grossmann and Gerlach, {Tanja M.} and J.J.A. Denissen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1177/1948550616652206",
language = "English",
volume = "7",
pages = "611--622",
journal = "Social Psychological and Personality Science",
issn = "1948-5506",
publisher = "Sage Publications, Inc.",
number = "7",

}

Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges. / Grossmann, Igor; Gerlach, Tanja M.; Denissen, J.J.A.

In: Social Psychological and Personality Science, Vol. 7, No. 7, 2016, p. 611-622.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Wise reasoning in the face of everyday life challenges

AU - Grossmann, Igor

AU - Gerlach, Tanja M.

AU - Denissen, J.J.A.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people's reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others' perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.

AB - How stable vs. dynamic is wisdom in daily life? We conducted a daily diary study of wise reasoning (WR) by recording people's reflections on daily challenges in terms of three facets: intellectual humility, self-transcendence, and consideration of others' perspectives/compromise. We observed substantial and systematic intraindividual variability in WR, with wiser reasoning in the social versus nonsocial contexts. State-level WR variability was potent in predicting a bigger-picture construal of the event, more positive (vs. negative) emotions, greater emotional complexity, lower emotional reactivity, less thought suppression, and more reappraisal and forgiveness. In contrast, on the trait level, we observed only a few associations to emotional complexity and reappraisal. We discuss implications for conceptualization and measurement of wisdom-related thought.

KW - wisdom

KW - state vs

KW - trait

KW - reasoning

KW - emotion regulation

KW - forgiveness

KW - 3-DIMENSIONAL WISDOM SCALE

KW - PERSONALITY STATES

KW - SELF-REFLECTION

KW - FORGIVENESS

KW - INTELLIGENCE

KW - KNOWLEDGE

KW - PERFORMANCE

KW - EXCELLENCE

KW - STRENGTH

KW - DISTANCE

U2 - 10.1177/1948550616652206

DO - 10.1177/1948550616652206

M3 - Article

VL - 7

SP - 611

EP - 622

JO - Social Psychological and Personality Science

JF - Social Psychological and Personality Science

SN - 1948-5506

IS - 7

ER -