Work performance and tax compliance in flat and progressive tax systems

Jozsef Pantya*, Judit Kovacs, C. Kogler, Erich Kirchler

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Different tax systems, and their impact on work motivation and tax compliance are significant issues in contemporary political and economic debates. The proportional feature of a flat tax system is assumed to lead to higher performance, while the fairness of the redistributive progressive tax system is assumed to result in higher tax compliance. However, empirical findings on the topic are inconclusive. Both work performance and tax compliance under different tax systems were examined in an experiment, with special attention devoted to the effect of a change in tax systems. A flat tax system was supposed to induce greater work performance, whereas a progressive tax system was expected to increase tax compliance based on fairness perceptions, allowing for the opposite effect due to higher complexity. Furthermore, it was assumed that performance and tax payments would be influenced by motives of self-interest. The design included 20 rounds with a real-effort task in each round, determining participants' experimental income. Participants (N = 191) made decisions about their tax payments from round-to-round in four different experimental conditions: (1) a flat tax system, (2) a progressive tax system, (3) starting with a flat and changing to a progressive, and (4) starting with a progressive and changing to a flat tax system. Results indicate higher work performance in a progressive system. However, a change from a progressive tax system to a flat system led to increased tax compliance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)262-273
JournalJournal of Economic Psychology
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2016

Keywords

  • Flat tax system
  • Progressive tax system
  • Tax compliance
  • Work performance
  • Fairness
  • Efficiency
  • SLIPPERY SLOPE FRAMEWORK
  • ECONOMIC-GROWTH
  • SELF-INTEREST
  • TAXATION
  • EVASION
  • ATTITUDES
  • INEQUITY
  • FAIRNESS
  • INCOME
  • PERSPECTIVE

Cite this

Pantya, Jozsef ; Kovacs, Judit ; Kogler, C. ; Kirchler, Erich. / Work performance and tax compliance in flat and progressive tax systems. In: Journal of Economic Psychology. 2016 ; Vol. 56. pp. 262-273.
@article{0ac00bde979c4c5d903ec9d66e08ea95,
title = "Work performance and tax compliance in flat and progressive tax systems",
abstract = "Different tax systems, and their impact on work motivation and tax compliance are significant issues in contemporary political and economic debates. The proportional feature of a flat tax system is assumed to lead to higher performance, while the fairness of the redistributive progressive tax system is assumed to result in higher tax compliance. However, empirical findings on the topic are inconclusive. Both work performance and tax compliance under different tax systems were examined in an experiment, with special attention devoted to the effect of a change in tax systems. A flat tax system was supposed to induce greater work performance, whereas a progressive tax system was expected to increase tax compliance based on fairness perceptions, allowing for the opposite effect due to higher complexity. Furthermore, it was assumed that performance and tax payments would be influenced by motives of self-interest. The design included 20 rounds with a real-effort task in each round, determining participants' experimental income. Participants (N = 191) made decisions about their tax payments from round-to-round in four different experimental conditions: (1) a flat tax system, (2) a progressive tax system, (3) starting with a flat and changing to a progressive, and (4) starting with a progressive and changing to a flat tax system. Results indicate higher work performance in a progressive system. However, a change from a progressive tax system to a flat system led to increased tax compliance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.",
keywords = "Flat tax system, Progressive tax system, Tax compliance, Work performance, Fairness, Efficiency, SLIPPERY SLOPE FRAMEWORK, ECONOMIC-GROWTH, SELF-INTEREST, TAXATION, EVASION, ATTITUDES, INEQUITY, FAIRNESS, INCOME, PERSPECTIVE",
author = "Jozsef Pantya and Judit Kovacs and C. Kogler and Erich Kirchler",
year = "2016",
month = "10",
doi = "10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "262--273",
journal = "Journal of Economic Psychology",
issn = "0167-4870",
publisher = "Elsevier Science BV",

}

Work performance and tax compliance in flat and progressive tax systems. / Pantya, Jozsef; Kovacs, Judit; Kogler, C.; Kirchler, Erich.

In: Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 56, 10.2016, p. 262-273.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Work performance and tax compliance in flat and progressive tax systems

AU - Pantya, Jozsef

AU - Kovacs, Judit

AU - Kogler, C.

AU - Kirchler, Erich

PY - 2016/10

Y1 - 2016/10

N2 - Different tax systems, and their impact on work motivation and tax compliance are significant issues in contemporary political and economic debates. The proportional feature of a flat tax system is assumed to lead to higher performance, while the fairness of the redistributive progressive tax system is assumed to result in higher tax compliance. However, empirical findings on the topic are inconclusive. Both work performance and tax compliance under different tax systems were examined in an experiment, with special attention devoted to the effect of a change in tax systems. A flat tax system was supposed to induce greater work performance, whereas a progressive tax system was expected to increase tax compliance based on fairness perceptions, allowing for the opposite effect due to higher complexity. Furthermore, it was assumed that performance and tax payments would be influenced by motives of self-interest. The design included 20 rounds with a real-effort task in each round, determining participants' experimental income. Participants (N = 191) made decisions about their tax payments from round-to-round in four different experimental conditions: (1) a flat tax system, (2) a progressive tax system, (3) starting with a flat and changing to a progressive, and (4) starting with a progressive and changing to a flat tax system. Results indicate higher work performance in a progressive system. However, a change from a progressive tax system to a flat system led to increased tax compliance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

AB - Different tax systems, and their impact on work motivation and tax compliance are significant issues in contemporary political and economic debates. The proportional feature of a flat tax system is assumed to lead to higher performance, while the fairness of the redistributive progressive tax system is assumed to result in higher tax compliance. However, empirical findings on the topic are inconclusive. Both work performance and tax compliance under different tax systems were examined in an experiment, with special attention devoted to the effect of a change in tax systems. A flat tax system was supposed to induce greater work performance, whereas a progressive tax system was expected to increase tax compliance based on fairness perceptions, allowing for the opposite effect due to higher complexity. Furthermore, it was assumed that performance and tax payments would be influenced by motives of self-interest. The design included 20 rounds with a real-effort task in each round, determining participants' experimental income. Participants (N = 191) made decisions about their tax payments from round-to-round in four different experimental conditions: (1) a flat tax system, (2) a progressive tax system, (3) starting with a flat and changing to a progressive, and (4) starting with a progressive and changing to a flat tax system. Results indicate higher work performance in a progressive system. However, a change from a progressive tax system to a flat system led to increased tax compliance. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

KW - Flat tax system

KW - Progressive tax system

KW - Tax compliance

KW - Work performance

KW - Fairness

KW - Efficiency

KW - SLIPPERY SLOPE FRAMEWORK

KW - ECONOMIC-GROWTH

KW - SELF-INTEREST

KW - TAXATION

KW - EVASION

KW - ATTITUDES

KW - INEQUITY

KW - FAIRNESS

KW - INCOME

KW - PERSPECTIVE

U2 - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.joep.2016.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 56

SP - 262

EP - 273

JO - Journal of Economic Psychology

JF - Journal of Economic Psychology

SN - 0167-4870

ER -