Abstract
In the Dutch model of worker representation, there are several possibilities for works councils to interfere with the appointment of company directors. The most far-reaching, if certain criteria are met, is the right for works councils in large companies to recommend the appointment of up to one-third of supervisory or non-executive directors. This is potentially an important tool, even though “their” board members do not have the formal role of articulating works council interests within the board. In addition, Dutch works councils have rights to influence the decision about the appointment of directors in the general meeting of shareholders. They also have the right to be consulted in the appointment of directors in the company's affiliated business. Whether and how this ability to interfere with the appointment of directors affects the running of the company depends on the real use of the rights granted to works councils. Moreover, the territorial scope places limits on the impact of the Dutch model in international groups.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Stakeholder engagement in European companies |
| Editors | Hanne Birkmose, Karsten Engsig Sørensen |
| Publisher | Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. |
| Chapter | 4 |
| Pages | 63-83 |
| Number of pages | 21 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 9781035356829 |
| ISBN (Print) | 9781035356812 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 11 Dec 2025 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 8 Decent Work and Economic Growth
-
SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
Keywords
- appointment company directors
- worker representation
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Workers’ rights to interfere with the appointment of company directors'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver