Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

WS and Others v Frontex (CJEU, C-679/23 P): No Longer Immune, Not Yet Accountable

Research output: Contribution to journal › Case note › Scientific › peer-review

Abstract

On 18 December 2025, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU/Court) delivered its Grand Chamber judgment in Hamoudi v Frontex (C-136/24 P) and WS and Others v Frontex (C-679/23 P), two actions for damages brought against the European Border Coast Guard Agency (EBCGA or Frontex). For the first time in the Agency's history, judicial actions brought against Frontex for fundamental rights violations managed to go through the admissibility stage. In Hamoudi, the Court set aside the General Court’s inadmissibility decision and referred the case back to it. In WS, the Court partially set aside the first instance judgment and referred it back as well. This note analyses the WS judgment, its key holdings, and the unresolved questions.
Original languageEnglish
JournalECHR Updates
Publication statusPublished - 2026

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 16 - Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions
    SDG 16 Peace, Justice and Strong Institutions

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'WS and Others v Frontex (CJEU, C-679/23 P): No Longer Immune, Not Yet Accountable'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this