'You didn't take Lucy's skirt off': The effect of misleading information on omissions and commissions in children's memory reports

Henry Otgaar, Ingrid Candel, Tom Smeets, Harald Merckelbach

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose
The current study explored how misleading information affects children's omissions and commissions over time.

Method
Fifty‐nine younger (Mage = 4.16) and fifty‐nine older (Mage = 9.44) children were instructed to remove three pieces of clothing from a puppet. Half of them were provided with false evidence that they had removed only two items, while the other half were provided with false evidence that they had removed a fourth piece of clothing. In three neutral interviews separated by 1‐week intervals, children had to report which pieces of clothing they had removed.

Results
Overall, omission and commission errors significantly decreased over time, although this pattern was more pronounced for omission errors. Younger and older children were equally likely to make omission errors, whereas commission errors were more typical for younger than for older children. Also, we found that commission errors more readily occur than omission errors.

Conclusion
Even when children's memory reports pertain to an event in which they actively participated, misleading information may elicit omission and commission errors, with especially the latter category being very persistent over time.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)229-241
JournalLegal and Criminological Psychology
Volume15
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
Externally publishedYes

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of ''You didn't take Lucy's skirt off': The effect of misleading information on omissions and commissions in children's memory reports'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this